The fine line that some East German photographers straddled between conformity and personal self-expression was made possible by the relaxation of Soviet authority following the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953. During the ensuing thaw, the constitution of the GDR was revised by the state legislature to reflect the evolving identity of the growing nation. Socialist realism was revised to reflect both the growing independence of East German art from the Soviet mold and the awakening of East German artists to their own cultural history. Having apparently outgrown its close identification with Stalinist rigidity, East German socialist realism came to be theorized from two opposing points of view. One side argued that change itself was the fundamental characteristic of socialist realism, and that this transformative quality was the key to its endurance and social significance. The other side concluded that socialist realism lacked theoretical coherence. Socialist realism, they declared, had been degraded into a slogan or sign used by proponents of widely opposing ideologies but was meaningless in and of itself. For these artists, the absence of a theoretical substructure revealed the superficiality of socialist realism, and suggested the eventual collapse of the authority of the state in cultural affairs.